Wednesday, October 9, 2013

EDUCATION, DEMOCRACY, AND THE LIFE WORTH LIVING

               










EDUCATION, DEMOCRACY, AND THE LIFE WORTH LIVING

                In the article, “EDUCATION, DEMOCRACY, AND THE LIFE WORTH LIVING” by Mark Kingwell (2012), Kingwell claims that today, a university education is attained for material reasons.  Kingwell bases his claim on personal conversations and research.  Kingwell’s purpose is to make us aware that we are turning into a society that does not value an education, but instead we are placing a monetary value on education.  Kingwell uses specific examples based on statistical data, in order for us to see that getting a college degree nowadays is not based on the need to have culture or higher learning, but mostly for the dollars attached to a particular job.  Kingwell is addressing an audience of college students, as well as parents who plant to send their children to college or are already have children attending college.
                I can’t tell you how many times I have heard people say, “Study this major because you will get a good paying job and you will have a great career”.  While there is nothing wrong with such a statement, I would like to hear, for a change, “Obtain a degree that will make you a better citizen by contributing to society and making a positive change”.  So I empathize with Kingwell, when he says that we are losing our integrity by not “valuing” education.

                Kingwell breaks down his reasoning by first giving a personal account of his conversation with a judge, who after finding out that he teaches philosophy says, “But what will your students do with that?”  Then Kingwell tells of his second conversation with a woman who says, “Philosophy! Really!  Do you have any idea what you’ll do with that?”  Clearly, the judge and the woman are implying that a degree in philosophy serves no purpose.  Furthermore, they are asking, what kind of career can you fashion out of a philosophy degree?  Kingwell asserts that many students of philosophy move on to accomplish a degree in law and even sometimes become judges.  Kingwell gives us a further breakdown as to why he thinks that too much market value is placed on education by sharing that there is a consensus among universities to base the theme of education on practicality and market competitiveness.  Kingwell quotes Robert Campbell, president of Mount Allison University in Sackville, New Brunswick as saying,  Parents of prospective students “are looking for a return” on investment in their child’s tuition. Kingwell further brings clarity to his point by laying out the statistics of a 2010 survey of 12,500 students who were asked, “What was the single most important reason in your decision to attend university”, only 9 percent said “a good general education”, while 70 percent said they went to college to “get a good job” or “train” for a specific career.” Kingwell delves further into his claim by saying that there is a “standard position”, that his held by students, parents and universities.  This standard position holds that while blue collar jobs are declining, with a college degree, you will get a job in the white collar market.  Additionally, college degrees must have a “$” attached to it, which leads to the soft option that says if we don’t get degrees that is related to the job market, we will not be competitive, thereby decimating our progress!  Kingwell rebuts the standard position and the soft option by saying that they are contradictory. Kingwell says that while we continue to pursue a degree, the job market is becoming saturated with graduates trying to find jobs in a depressive economy.  Kingwell points out that if this cycle continues there will be a disparity in wealth, resulting in the demise of democracy.  Also, in a democracy we need people who can think critically without putting a monetary value on their duty to society.  Most importantly Kingwell is saying that we must be virtuous in our character, and that virtue does not come with a “$” attached to it.  Kingwell says that we are simply delusional to think that our status quo and wealth gained from receiving a higher education make us contributors to society.  Kingwell proves his point well.  What kind of society will we have when most of those seeking higher education are not doing it to rectify society’s ills or to help cultivate the minds of the younger generations?  If this trend continues, there will be a breakdown in society from the top to the bottom.  Confucius once said, “He who governs by means of virtue is like the pole-star: it remains in its place while all the lesser stars do homage to it.”

No comments:

Post a Comment